$657 Million No One Had to Announce
Ten DoD contracts in our expiring pipeline were awarded 8(a) sole source, and every one is far above the threshold that is supposed to force a competition among 8(a) firms. The exemption that allows it carries no dollar ceiling at all, and the first of the ten comes off contract in February.
If you run a capture pipeline against DoD services and construction work, you keep a mental list of requirements that went away. No sources-sought, no synopsis, no award notice you could find.
The work is clearly still being performed, and you never got a shot at it.
Ten of those are sitting in our expiration pipeline right now. Combined obligations of $656,909,412, spread across the Army Corps, the Air Force, NAVSEA, ACC-Rock Island and USSOCOM, and every single one shows one offer received.
They are all coded the same way in FPDS: 8(A) SOLE SOURCE, with the authority reading AUTHORIZED BY STATUTE (FAR 6.302-5(A)(2)(I)). Which raises the obvious problem.
"How does a $79 million contract get awarded sole source when the rule says anything over $4.5 million has to be competed?"
The threshold that is supposed to force a competition
Most capture teams know the 8(a) program has a number in it. 13 CFR 124.506(a)(2) says a requirement offered to and accepted by SBA for the 8(a) program must be competed among eligible participants when three things are true at once:
- There is a reasonable expectation that at least two eligible participants will submit offers at a fair market price.
- The anticipated award price, including options, exceeds $7,000,000 for contracts assigned manufacturing NAICS codes and $4,500,000 for everything else.
- The requirement has not been accepted by SBA as a sole source award on behalf of a tribally-owned or ANC-owned concern.
The second one is the number people quote. The threshold is applied to the procuring activity's own estimate of total value including all options (124.506(a)(3)), and a requirement above it cannot be sliced into pieces to get underneath (124.506(a)(5)).
By that number, none of these ten is a close call. The smallest is Compass Point LLC at USSOCOM, $51,130,754 for training readiness and mission labor, which is 11.4 times the $4.5M line. Two of the ten carry manufacturing codes and so get tested against $7M instead: Tundra Federal at AFLCMC (334111, an Active Directory hardware refresh, $74,004,043) and ReconCraft at NAVSEA (336612, 40-foot patrol boats, $55,048,603). Both clear that bar by better than 7x.
So the second condition is satisfied for all ten, loudly. The reason no competition happened is the third one.
Condition three is the whole story
Read it as a capture manager rather than a lawyer. The competition requirement switches off if SBA accepted the requirement as a sole source award for a tribally-owned or ANC-owned concern. The rule then says so directly at 124.506(b)(1): such a participant "may be awarded a sole source 8(a) contract where the anticipated value of the procurement exceeds the applicable competitive threshold."
124.506(b)(2) extends the same exemption to firms owned by a Native Hawaiian Organization, and does it for DoD contracts only. Every NHO-owned award in this set is at DoD by construction.
Neither paragraph contains a dollar cap.
All ten went to entity-owned firms. Five are ANC-owned (Bering-Weston JV, Tundra Federal, Brice Builders, Tunista Logistics, Compass Point), two are tribally owned (Wolftek Mission Group, KRE JV), and two are NHO-owned (JBW Group, Rivet Operations). The tenth, ReconCraft, codes as "American Indian Owned Business" rather than "Tribally Owned Firm", so the flag alone would put it outside the exemption. Its corporate family resolves that: ReconCraft belongs to the Copper River Family of Companies, owned by the Native Village of Eyak in Cordova, Alaska, and an 8(a) participant since 2006. The exemption applies; the FPDS coding does not carry it.
Two of the ten are joint ventures, and that is covered too. 124.506(b)(4) lets a JV between an eligible entity-owned participant and one or more non-8(a) firms take sole source awards above the threshold, provided it meets 124.513.
Bering-Weston JV at Corps Honolulu and KRE JV at Corps Tulsa both sit there. And 124.506(b)(3) closes off the argument you might expect an agency to have to make: "There is no requirement that a procurement must be competed whenever possible before it can be accepted on a sole source basis."
The rest of this brief is for subscribers.
The specific solicitations, dockets, and dates to act on sit past this line.
$50 a month, or $500 a year.
Already a subscriber? Sign in